Avast, ye scurvy dogs! The Google Bard content ought to be fact-checked, as the current Google VP be advisin'!
2023-07-28
Arrr, in a Blimey Bee Cee parley, the first mate o' Google UK declares that this fancy AI be meant fer joinin' hands and stirrin' up the artistic juices, ye scurvy dog!
In a recent BBC interview, Debbie Weinstein, Vice President of Google UK, recommends fact-checking content generated by the Bard AI using Google Search. She explains that Bard is more of an experimental tool for collaboration and generating new ideas, rather than a reliable resource for specific information. Weinstein advises users to use the thumbs up and thumbs down buttons to provide feedback and improve the chatbot. However, the BBC points out that Bard's homepage does not mention the need to double-check results via Google Search.Weinstein's advice is not unfounded, as generative AIs like Bard often produce false information. These chatbots may hallucinate and generate text that is completely untrue. In fact, two New York lawyers faced consequences when they used ChatGPT in a case and presented fictitious legal research cited by the AI. So, it is prudent to verify the information provided by Bard.
However, it is concerning that these comments come from a vice president of Google. Bard is essentially a fancy search engine that aims to provide factual information and enhance Google Search. During I/O 2023, Google showcased how the AI model could enhance search results and provide in-depth information on various topics. If Bard is deemed untrustworthy for important information, then why is it being incorporated into Google Search to further enhance it?
This contradictory statement raises questions about the company's plans and the reliability of generative AI. Trust in accurate information output is crucial for the future of AI. The article concludes by mentioning that TechRadar has updated its list of the best AI tools for 2023 and invites readers to check it out.