The Booty Report

News and Updates for Swashbucklers Everywhere

Pray tell, matey! Be ye willing to surrender yer secret codes forever? Apple and Google be urg'n ye to do so!

2023-09-08

Arrr! Google and Apple be craftin' Passkeys, mateys! A far better way for ye landlubbers to control yer app access and be done with them pesky old passwords. Avast! Give 'em a try, ye scurvy dogs!

Our friend Kirk from North Carolina has posed an interesting question: Is Apple iCloud Keychain better than Google Passkeys? Now, we have two contenders in the ring: Apple's Passkeys and Google Passkeys. They are like the Ali and Frazier of the password management world.
Apple Passkeys, introduced in iOS 16 and macOS 13, allow you to sign in to apps and websites without passwords. They are stored on your device and protected by Face ID or Touch ID. Google Passkeys are simple and secure alternatives to passwords, supported by Chrome on various devices. They can be shared using Google Password Manager.
Both Apple Passkeys and Google Passkeys offer passwordless authentication and aim to provide a simpler and more secure user experience. They rely on device screen lock mechanisms to verify the user's identity and sync passkeys across devices. However, Apple Passkeys have additional features like signing in with a QR code or an external security key.
While passkeys are safer, some concerns remain. The dependence on a single method of access and potential glitches make third-party password managers a reliable choice. These password managers securely store and generate complex passwords, making it easier for users to manage multiple accounts.
In the end, the choice between Apple Passkeys, Google Passkeys, or password managers depends on individual preferences and tech lifestyles. Diehard Apple or Google user? Stick with their respective options. Otherwise, a password manager might be the way to go. So, which path will you choose?
For more tech tips and security alerts, subscribe to the free CyberGuy Report Newsletter at Cyberguy.com/Newsletter.

Read the Original Article