"Mornin' Glory, matey! Nay wall, nay bargain be struck, arrr!"
2024-01-30
Avast, me hearties! The Senate and House GOP be needin' to abandon any scallywag "compromise" on immigration that don't start with buildin' the Wall, or else they'll be walkin' the plank!
In a humorous tone resembling the language of a 17th-century pirate, Ambassador Robert O'Brien expresses his belief that the southern border of the United States is a significant national security threat. He highlights the risks of terrorists, illegal drugs, and human trafficking entering the country through the border. O'Brien emphasizes the need for border security and states that securing the border should be the top priority for national security experts.The author argues that negotiations between Republicans and Democrats in Washington, D.C. regarding border security should result in a bill guaranteeing the rapid construction of a 900-mile wall along the passable areas of the U.S.-Mexico border. They assert that if the bill does not include this provision, it should not pass in either the House of Representatives or the Senate. The author suggests that a campaign should be launched on this issue and that the people should be trusted to make the decision.
The author, who has been writing about the southern border since the 1980s, believes that a significant barrier, now known as "The Wall," is necessary. They argue that more than a thousand miles of the border are impassable, but approximately 900 miles require a tall and durable wall. The author emphasizes the importance of a well-maintained road alongside the wall and the need for additional fences and technology to deter illegal migration.
The author acknowledges that the wall will not completely end unauthorized migration but believes it will significantly reduce it. They propose that other measures, such as increased Border Patrol agents and improved detention centers, should accompany the construction of the wall. The author contends that the wall is essential as it symbolizes the country's commitment to border control and serves as a visible expression of national security.
The author cites examples of other countries building walls and suggests that the lack of a wall attracts poor and desperate migrants and poses a risk to national security. They argue that the wall is a common sense solution and a political imperative, as the majority of Republicans and a significant number of Americans support its construction. The author also criticizes the lack of transparency and credibility in government data regarding illegal immigration.
In conclusion, the author asserts that the wall must be built as a necessary first step in addressing border security and immigration issues. They argue that any legislation without provisions for the wall should be rejected, as it would be ineffective and fail to address the ongoing crisis at the southern border.