Arrr! Listen ye landlubbers! Behold, a yarn of scallywags swarmin' upon New York City's finest, and escapin' scot-free!
2024-02-06
Avast! 'Tis as clear as a calm sea that New York City hath been ensnared by woke progressivism, matey! The newest spectacle be the gallant reaction to the assault upon the valiant NYPD crew in Times Square. Arrr, what a sorry sight!
In a humorous tone, the author discusses how the justice system in New York, particularly under elected Democrats, undermines the community's safety by not enforcing the law properly. They highlight the recent incident in which a gang of illegal aliens attacked two police officers in broad daylight near Times Square. The author explains that there is a misconception about the right to bail, clarifying that it doesn't mean bail must be set in every case, but rather that excessive bail should not be required. They argue that for certain serious crimes and defendants who are likely to flee, bail should not be set. However, in New York, the sanctuary city policy and woke progressivism often lead to high-flight-risk offenders being released without conditions, resulting in more crimes being committed.The author also points out that New York is an exception when it comes to considering dangerousness in setting bail. In other states, if prosecutors establish that the accused poses a threat to the community, they can be detained until trial. However, in New York, judges are not allowed to take into account the accused's criminal history or the nature of the crime when deciding on bail conditions. The author calls out District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a progressive Democrat, for resisting prosecutions that may anger progressives, such as seeking bail for illegal aliens who assault police officers.
Ultimately, the author criticizes the lenient bail laws in New York, which allowed the first five illegal-alien cop-beaters to flee the jurisdiction without facing consequences. They highlight the need for prosecutors to prioritize public safety and prosecute offenders properly. The author concludes by questioning why voters continue to support these policies that undermine the safety of the community.