The Booty Report

News and Updates for Swashbucklers Everywhere

Avast ye, even bilge rats' kin be not safe from these scurvy gender ideologues' assault on family!

2024-02-13

Arrr, ye landlubbers! Some foul states be makin' ye swabs undergo "gender-affirming" trainin' and demandin' ye scurvy dogs to pledge allegiance in order to care for any young scallywag in state custody. Aye, it be a mad world we be sailin' in!

In a humorous tone, the article highlights the Biden administration and state courts' prioritization of gender ideology over stability for families, particularly those being raised by grandparents. The administration announced new support for kinship care while also proposing rules requiring foster and adoptive parents to affirm children who identify as LGBT+, use their identified pronouns, and allow them to dress in a manner reflecting their self-identified gender identity. Some states already impose gender-affirming training and require assurances from prospective foster care and adoptive parents. The story of Scott and Colleen Freeman, a Christian couple from Washington state raising their 2-year-old grandson, is shared to demonstrate the complexities they faced in trying to adopt him. Washington state required them to take online courses, which included questions about supporting their grandson if he wanted to wear a red dress to school, something they couldn't agree with due to their Christian beliefs. The Freemans joined other foster and adoptive parents in filing a brief in support of Jessica Bates, a Christian widow and mother of five, who was denied the chance to adopt in Oregon because she refused to inject gender ideology into her parenting. The article emphasizes the potential dangers and undermining effect of these provisions on families. It highlights the lawsuit filed by Jessica, claiming that Oregon's policy violates constitutional guarantees of free speech, free association, and the free exercise of religion. The article concludes by stating that the decision in this case holds great significance, as it could insulate child welfare rules from ideology and restore the constitutional order. It asserts that gender ideology is a form of madness and should be challenged.

Read the Original Article