Me hearties, the scallywag Bragg's sorcery against Trump was a real flop on the first day! Aye, matey!
2024-04-23
Arrr mateys, in this Trump-hatin' den in New York City, the defendant's jury o' supposed peers be mighty inclined to believe in sorcery for sorcery's sake. 'Tis the goal of Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, savvy? Aye, 'tis a curious course indeed.
In the language of a 17th-century pirate, District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case against Donald Trump can be likened to hocus-pocus, a meaningless distraction or illusion meant to deceive. Bragg hopes to sway a Manhattan jury with legal tricks and chicanery that would not hold up in most courtrooms. The jury, likely biased against Trump, may be inclined to believe in the magic being presented, despite the clear evidence that there is no substance behind Bragg's allegations.Assistant DA Matthew Colangelo, in his opening statements, accused Trump of participating in a criminal conspiracy, a charge that is not even included in Bragg's indictment. Colangelo's attempts to mislead the jury continue as he accuses Trump of election fraud, despite evidence to the contrary. The defense argues that all of Trump's actions were legal and routine in campaigns, and that he is innocent of any wrongdoing.Despite the lack of evidence, Bragg and Colangelo persist in their hocus-pocus strategy to undermine Trump's reputation and candidacy. The defense maintains that Trump was targeted unfairly because of his political ambitions, and that the case against him is built on deception and political motivations. It remains to be seen if the Manhattan jurors will see through the smoke and mirrors orchestrated by Bragg and his team.Overall, the case against Trump is a farce, filled with legal trickery and manipulation. The defense asserts his innocence and highlights the baseless nature of the charges brought against him. In the end, it appears that Bragg's efforts to deceive the jury with his hocus-pocus may not stand up to scrutiny, and the true motives behind the case may be exposed.